Sam is well regarded by those that instruct him for his eye for detail, cross-examination skills and overall expertise.
His clients include banks, blue-chip companies, City recruitment agencies, utility companies, public authorities and NHS Trusts and associated organisations. Sam has an in-depth understanding of the international financial markets as a result of his work in the TCI on many international banking related disputes.
Sam has also developed a practice in representing claimants in cases involving allegations of sexual misconduct and abuse. These cases are often high profile and reported in the media. One example is A v Mike Hill MP (2021) which was widely reported in the press (read the Devereux news item here). The Claimant was ultimately awarded in excess of £430,000.
In 2023 Sam represented another claimant in a claim against a conservative MP, which involved allegations of sexual harassment and sex discrimination.
Sam (led by Suzanne Mckie KC) also recently represented the Claimant in a case involving very serious allegations of sexual misconduct, by a senior manager, against a City financial institution and achieved a large settlement.
In January 2022 Sam successfully represented British Gas Services Limited in the first case arising out of the business modernisation exercise (widely reported in the media as a “fire and rehire”) which resulted in the dismissal of over 400 engineers: Fisher and O’Donnell v British Gas Services Limited.
Sam also has extensive experience in advising in cases involving apprenticeship law, equal pay claims, and employee competition and restrictive covenants.
Appellate Employment Work:
At appellate level in the UK Sam has acted in the following cases:
- Olubodun v Total Stay Group Ltd (UKEAT/0204/09/DA): an appeal against a Tribunal's decision on victimisation.
- Hensman v MOD (UKEAT/0067/14/DM): Sam was instructed at the EAT stage and represented the Claimant in the EAT on an appeal by the Respondent on all aspects of the Tribunal's decision. The case is an important authority on the issue of justification in disability discrimination.
- Atanda v Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health (UKEAT/0272/17/JOJ): Sam represented the Claimant in this appeal arising from allegations of sex discrimination.
- Rakova v London North West Healthcare NHS Trust (UKEAT/0043/19/LA): Sam was instructed by the Respondent in an appeal involve reasonable adjustments.
- Singh v Metroline West Limited [2022] EAT 80 (see below).
- Clarke Willaims v Greater Manchester Police (r3.10 hearing): Sam successfully represented the Appellant (GMP) at this preliminary hearing – the unusual aspect of this case is that it is an appeal against the Tribunal’s use of broad discretion in using its case management powers.
- Grayling v Wolsley: (June 2023): Sam successfully represented the Respondent, before Eady J, in defending an appeal against the Tribunal’s finding on reasonable adjustments.
- Leeks v Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust [2024] EAT 128: Sam represented the Respondent in this important appeal which interpreted the Employment Righta Act 1996 (NHS Recruitment – Protected Disclosure) Regulations 2018.
Recent highlights of Sam’s work include:
- O’D v A French Investment Bank (2025): Sam was represented the Bank at a final hearing in a sex and disability discrimination and victimisation claim pleaded at circa £3 million. The claimant was represented by a KC.
- Mr. H v An Investment Bank (ongoing): Sam is currently instructed on behalf of the Bank in a complex claim for disability discrimination and whistleblowing, currently pleaded at circa £2million.
- Andreou v London Ambulance Service (2024): Sam successfully represented the LAS in this claim for disability and age discrimination.
- Zaidi v An American Bank (2024): Sam was instructed by the bank to attend a number of preliminary hearings (including successful strike-out and costs hearings) in this pregnancy and sex discrimination case.
- Llewellyn-Jones v TPG Services Limited (2024): Sam was instructed for the Respondent in this case involving allegations of discrimination on the grounds of an ethical belief in veganism. The Claimant withdrew after Sam cross-examined her.
- Okwu v The Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust (2024): Sam successfully represented the Respondent in this claim of disability discrimination and whistleblowing.
- Stacey v Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (2023): Sam successfully represented the Respondent in this complex whistleblowing claim.
- Fekete v A Financial Institution (2023): (the “Sandwiches on Expenses” case) Sam represented the Respondent in this case which generated widespread publicity.
- Miller v Tesco Stores Ltd (2023): Sam successfully acted for the Respondent in this complex whistleblowing (involving allegations and detriment and automatic unfair dismissal) and disability discrimination claim.
- Singh v Metroline West Limited [2022] EAT 80: Sam successfully represented the Claimant in his appeal against the finding by the Tribunal that there was no fundamental breach of contract and therefore no constructive dismissal.
- Meloy v University of Leeds (2022): Sam represented the Respondent in this health and safety, and whistleblowing detriment case.
- Bone v West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust(2022): Sam represented the Trust in this claim of unfair dismissal, disability and race discrimination.
- Burns v Mace (2021): Sam successfully represented the Respondent in this claim of unfair dismissal (redundancy arising from economic consequences of the pandemic) direct disability discrimination, harassment and failure to make reasonable adjustments.
- Grayling v Wolseley UK Ltd & Others (2021): Sam successfully represented the Respondents in a 8 day case involving allegations of disability discrimination and harassment.
- G v London Ambulance Service NHS Trust (2021): Sam successfully acted in this complex 10 day discrimination case.
- Dozie v Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (2020): Sam successfully represented the First Respondent in this claim for race and disability discrimination
- Remmer v Primark: Sam represented the Respondent in this 5 day disability discrimination claim.
- Amaglo v Emcor Group Plc: Sam represented the Respondent in the whistleblowing claim, including successfully defending an application for interim relief.
- A v Mike Hill MP: (see above for full details).
- Dr M Abdollahi v University Hospital of Southampton Foundation Trust: Sam represented the Trust in this unfair dismissal claim by a doctor.
- GLP v East London Foundation Trust: a 9 day unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claim.
- A multi-day preliminary-hearing on privilege – led by Suzanne Mckie KC.
Interim Relief Hearings
Sam has undertaken a number of interim relief hearings including:
- Chalk v Tesco Stores (2025)
- L v A Solicitors Firm (2025)
Legal Privilege
Sam has acted in a number of cases before the Employment Tribunals which involve complex points of legal privilege and is readily able to advise in this potentially difficult area.
Investigations
Sam is experienced in conducting workplace investigations:
- A complex cross-border investigation into financial mismanagement at a multinational insurance company. This investigation involved the most senior employees, including the CFO.
- A complex investigation into sexual harassment and discrimination in the workplace, involving interviewing over 20 employees.
- An investigation into serious but historic racial discrimination.
- A complex investigation into discrimination and whistleblowing in the workplace.
- A workplace investigation into an allegation of assault and a counter allegation of bullying.
- An investigation into allegations of serious breaches of GDPR.
- Sam is currently instructed on two complex whistleblowing investigations.
Sam has also provided comprehensive training in this area to a number of solicitors firms.
Privacy Issues
Sam has particular expertise in dealing with high-profile cases involving the whole range of privacy orders available in the Employment Tribunals.
Protection from Harassment Act 1997 claims
Sam has also been instructed in a number of claims under the PHA 1997 in the civil courts.
General
In addition to his extensive experience in Employment Law matters, Sam has considerable experience of both General Medical Council and Nursing and Midwifery Council prosecutions whilst working for Field Fisher Waterhouse in their Professional Regulatory Department. Sam therefore accepts instructions in this area, defending medical and other professionals who have been prosecuted by their regulatory bodies.
Sam has acted in employment related Judicial Review proceedings in the High Court as sole counsel: Kirk & Ors, R (on the app'n of) v Action for Children [2010] IRLR 699, in which he successfully defended an application for an injunction.
In 2012, Sam was junior to Suzanne McKie QC in the High Court case of Gelpack v Nexpack, an expedited final hearing, concerning enforceability of non-compete, non-dealing and non-solicitation clauses; resisting a springboard injunction.
Print PDF
Connect
Vcard
